Superman Returns. This was THE summer movie I was looking forward to. When the super-fiance dragged me to X3, I annoyed her by continually whispering "Superman could totally kick all their asses." Unfortunately this is is not true as the returned Superman does not fight.
Issue #1) No super-chingaso, super-fisticuffs, or super-bitchslapping. What was the thinking here? Superman is closing in on his 70th birthday. What is behind his enduring popularity? He's SUPER, man. He does shit that normal folks can't do. Like kick super amounts of ass. I mean damn, glue some rubber stalagmites on Danny Trejo and you've got Doomsday for Supes to pound on. Slap an Atomic Skull head on Ed Norton and you've got, ummm, the Atomic Skull to zap radiation around. Goddammit, superhero flix is action flix. Good and evil trade knuckle sandwiches for the fate of the world. Are you with me?!
Issue #2) People walking out of the theatre asking "How did she not know who the father was?" So Returns was set after Superman II when Supes gives Lois a super-kiss and she forgets everything blah blah blah, but ignoring Superman III and IV.
Nice thought, but these movies are more than twenty years old. How the fuck is Joe Moviegoer supposed to get this? I read the interviews online where Singer explains the setting and continuity. I'm a fucking comic geek. Did they expect everyone to research this? Reading homework should not be mandatory for movie enjoyment. A franchise reboot worked for Batman, it would have worked here, instead of this muddle.
Issue #3 Worst. Story. Ever. Movie treatments of iconic properties need to reveal essential truths. You have to tell us someting that we did not know before. It has to fit.
Take the original Trek movies. Wrath of Khan is the best one, the only one that really works. A forgotten secret from Kirk's past has been growing cancer-like in a dark corner of the Trek galaxy, and it materializes to bite Kirk in the ass in a major way. Character development, backstory, "Khan!!!!" this is what I'm talking about. That crappy movie with whales in San Fransisco - totally retarded. Nobody remembers that junk.
What does Superman abandoning his son tell us about Superman? I dunno.
Bullshit imagery of supes falling backtoward earth, posed like Jesus on the cross. Too easy, and it doesn't work. Yes, Superman is powerful like a god. That's where the similarities end. If he lives, it isn't a sacrifice. Superman is not about the peace and love, just like Jesus doesn't fight
ninjas.
Worst Offense: Lois Lane is supposed to be plucky and capable, too smart for her own good. As seen here she's reduced to simpering over Supes. Also, she gets brutally bounced around an airplane and bonked on the head a couple times with a rock and she's put through the emotional ringer. Superman movies are NOT about sadism towards Lois.
Nice Touch: In the old skool books, there are plenty of panels where thugs with Tommy Guns try to ventilate Superman, this was usually rendered as orange streaks ricocheting off his chest. In the movie the Tommy Gun is updated to a mini-gun. Not worth the price of admission, but still cool.